Judicial Review Essay - 848 Words

After the 1800 election where Thomas Jefferson won, President John Adams proceed to fill the judicial branch with members of his own party, the Federalists. In response, Jeffersons party of the Republicans repealed the Judiciary Act of 1800. This act created new position on the bench for Federalist judges. The Supreme Court was threatened with impeachment if they overturned the repeal (Marbury v. Madison,1803). President Adams attempted to fill these new vacancies prior to the end of his term but some of the commissions were not delivered. When Jefferson was sworn in, he refused to honor these commissions. As a result, one of the appointees, William Marbury, sued the new Secretary of State, James Madison. Marbury asked the Supreme Court†¦show more content†¦It set the Court as arbiter and final authority of the Constitution. As a result of this ruling, the Supreme Court became an equal partner in the three branches of the federal government. Thus giving the U.S. government j udicial review. Thomas Jefferson stated that considering the judges as arbiters of all constitutional questions is dangerous. Because they are in office for life and not responsible to the elective control (Marbury v. Madison,1803). On the other side of the Atlantic Ocean, the Dutch have utilized this statement in their debates about judicial review in the Netherlands (Serves, 2009). Their system is rather complicated and confusing system. Their formal laws which are laws of the parliament. The material law is the law from lower bodies like the county. These laws the judges are allowed to check to determine it is in accordance with the Constitution. The judges are not allowed to determine if formal laws are in accordance with the Constitution. Article 94 and 120 in the Constitution forbid it. The main reason of not having judicial review is it is the responsibility of the legislator to decide of a bill is in accordance with the Constitution. Its maintenance is in the hands of the pa rliament and government. If there is a dispute with a formal law, the dispute should be settle by a legislator not a judge (Serves, 2009). Since 2002 Femke Halsema has trying to obtainShow MoreRelatedJudicial Review2674 Words   |  11 Pagescontroversy of judicial review which at extreme points, is called judicial activism, is a concept new to India. Judicial review can be defined as the judiciary, in the exercise of its own independence, checking and cross checking the working of the other organs of the government, while trying to uphold the ideal of ‘the rule of law’. Judicial activism more reformist in character is often confused with judicial review. According to Black’s Law Dictionary, judicial activism is â€Å"a philosophy of judicial decision-makingRead MoreJudicial Review : The Constitution1168 Words   |  5 PagesJudicial Review is the power of courts to determine whether or not actions by the government are valid. The courts adjudicate the consti tutionality of the governmental actions under review to ensure their validity. Under judicial review, the government actions under consideration for validity are presidential orders and actions, as well as legislation by Congress. In other words, judicial review is a check on the executive and legislative branches of the government. Judicial review checks these governmentalRead MoreJudicial Review : The Supreme Court968 Words   |  4 PagesJudicial review is the idea that the actions of the executive and legislative branches of government are subject to review and possible invalidation by the judicial branch, most commonly the Supreme Court. It allows the Supreme Court to take an active role in ensuring that the other branches of government abide by the constitution, as they interpret the document. This process is paramount in protecting the validity of the Constitution as well as upholding the laws set forth by it as well. JudicialRead MoreJudicial Review And The Indian Courts 2740 Words   |  11 PagesJUDICIAL REVIEW AND THE INDIAN COURTS Introduction Judicial Review is basically an aspect of judicial power of the state which is exercised by the courts to determine the validity of a rule of law or an action of any agency of the state. The courts have the power of testing the validity of legislative as well as other governmental action with reference to the provisions of the constitution. The judiciary tries to undo the harm that is being done by the legislature and executive and they also tryRead MoreJudicial Review and Judicial Supremacy: a Paradigm of Constitutionalism in Nigeria.15519 Words   |  63 PagesJUDICIAL REVIEW AND JUDICIAL SUPREMACY: A PARADIGM OF CONSTITUTIONALISM IN NIGERIA. By A.T.Shehu, PhD( ABSTRACT This paper examines judicial review and judicial power in Nigeria under the 1999 Constitution in relation to the constitution itself and in relation to the political branches of government. This is essentially to locate where lays supremacy between the branches and the judiciary particularly the Supreme Court with its final appellate jurisdiction. Judicial review and supremacy of theRead MoreJudicial Review And The Indian Courts1444 Words   |  6 PagesPolitical Science Essay Monsoon Semester 2014 Submitted by- Pradyumna Soni 214048 JUDICIAL REVIEW AND THE INDIAN COURTS Introduction Judicial Review is basically an aspect of judicial power of the state which is exercised by the courts to determine the validity of a rule of law or an action of any agency of the state. The courts have the power of testing the validity of legislative as well as other governmental action with reference to the provisions of the constitution. TheRead MoreJudicial Review : The United States1242 Words   |  5 Pagescase that they play a very big part in the public’s policy making. Judicial review is the primary role of the federal courts to discuss back and forth if a law is unconstitutional. Judicial review can also regulate the acts or behaviors that the Executive and Judicial carry out in legislation and the Courts may choose to declare those actions taken by the other branches or not those actions are unconstitutional or not. Judicial review is also the main source of power in the Supreme court s. It hasRead MoreJudicial Review : The United States813 Words   |  4 PagesTh e judicial review is the convention concealed by the executive and legislative activities which are liable for the judiciary to look over. Particular courts that have judicial review authority must repeal the demonstrations of the state. This happens when it discovers them inconsistent with a higher power. Judicial review is a case of the detachment of forces in a present day administrative framework. This rule is translated diversely in distinctive wards, so the method and extent of judicial reviewRead MoreJudicial Review : An Intrinsic Necessity1312 Words   |  6 PagesSubmissions to the High Court Regarding Judicial review is an intrinsic necessity to the Australian Government and is a critical aspect in enforcing accountability of both the legislative and executive branches. Essentially, the actions of constituent legislative and executive branches are subject to review, regardless of these governmental counterparts holding authority exceeding that of the judiciary. In fact, a number of provisions for judicial review are upheld by the Australian ConstitutionRead More The case against Judicial Review Essay892 Words   |  4 PagesThe Case Against Judicial Review In order to make a case against judicial review it is first important to understand the origins. Born in 1803 out of the landmark United States Supreme Court decision of Marbury V. Madison, judicial review gives the court the power to invalidate any law repugnant (or in conflict with) to the constitution. Judicial review has for the courts, become a self made license to strike down legitimately made legislation by democratically elected representatives